Texas A&M International University
Institutional Research
Survey of Services Provided
Spring 2001
Have you had occasion to request services
from the Institutional Research Office over the past Academic Year?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Yes |
24 |
82.8 |
82.8 |
82.8 |
| No |
5 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
100.0 |
| Total |
29 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Surveys
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Surveys |
5 |
20.8 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Missing |
System |
19 |
79.2 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
Statistics
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Statisitics |
13 |
54.2 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Missing |
System |
11 |
45.8 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
Focus Reports
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Focus Reports |
11 |
45.8 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Missing |
System |
13 |
54.2 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
Student Data
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Student Data |
8 |
33.3 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Missing |
System |
16 |
66.7 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
Other
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Other |
1 |
4.2 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Missing |
System |
23 |
95.8 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
If you requested information was it provided
in a timely manner?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Always |
18 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
| Often |
5 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
95.8 |
| Sometimes |
1 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
How satisfied were you with the information
you received?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Very Satisfied |
17 |
70.8 |
70.8 |
70.8 |
| Satisfied |
7 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
How satisfied were you with the clarity of the information
you received?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Very Satisfied |
17 |
70.8 |
70.8 |
70.8 |
| Satisfied |
7 |
29.2 |
29.2 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
How often do you use general university
statistics?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Always |
5 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
| Often |
13 |
54.2 |
54.2 |
75.0 |
| Sometimes |
6 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
How important are these statistics to
you?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Very Important |
18 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
75.0 |
| Important |
6 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Rate the helpfulness of the
office staff when you requested their service.
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Excellent |
19 |
79.2 |
79.2 |
79.2 |
| Very Good |
3 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
91.7 |
| Good |
2 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Have you used the statistics provided
in the office homepage on the internet?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Yes |
8 |
33.3 |
33.3 |
33.3 |
| No |
16 |
66.7 |
66.7 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
If yes, how would you rate the homepage?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Excellent |
2 |
8.3 |
28.6 |
28.6 |
| Very Good |
3 |
12.5 |
42.9 |
71.4 |
| Good |
2 |
8.3 |
28.6 |
100.0 |
| Total |
7 |
29.2 |
100.0 |
|
| Missing |
System |
17 |
70.8 |
|
|
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
|
|
How would you rate the office staff overall?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
| Valid |
Excellent |
15 |
62.5 |
62.5 |
62.5 |
| Very Good |
8 |
33.3 |
33.3 |
95.8 |
| Good |
1 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
100.0 |
| Total |
24 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Comments or suggestions regarding the Institutional Research Office:
1. Need to have a plan and produce a yearly and standardized set of institutional data that gives us critical information for our Universities student body according to their classification (ex. student profiles pre & post).
2. Thanks for all the hard work!
3. General university statistics should be published. This will decrease the volume of direct and/or repetitive requests.
4. Didn't know the webpage had been updated.
5. Elizabeth is a very knowledgeable employee. She knows exactly what I need and is able to fulfill my request immediately.
6. Do a good job!
7. Elizabeth Martinez has always been excellent.
8. Elizabeth does an excellent job.
9. Elizabeth is always a pleasure to work with.
10. Excellent work I appreciate the quick response.
11. I have dealt with the office in the past through my supervisor. I plan to access your information more often for new departmental reports.
12. I am unaware of the services, which this office offers. I usually contact Elizabeth Martinez, who is always very helpful.