ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Human Resources
Administrative or Educational Support Unit
September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003
Assessment Period Covered
July 21, 2003
Date Submitted
Expanded Statement of Institutional Purpose Linkage:
Institutional Mission/Goal(s) Reference:
Texas A&M International University, a Member of the Texas A&M
University System, is committed to the preparation of students for leadership
roles in their chosen profession and in an increasingly complex, culturally
diverse state, national, and global society… Through instruction, faculty
and student research, and public service, Texas A&M International
University is a strategic point of delivery for well-defined programs
and services that improve the quality of life for citizens of the border
region, the State of Texas, and national and international communities.
Administrative or Educational Support Unit Mission Statement:
The Office of Human Resources will recruit, retain, and develop
quality staff committed to the preparation of students for leadership
roles in their chosen profession and in an increasingly complex, culturally
diverse state, national, and global society.
Intended Administrative Objectives:
1. Recruit and retain quality staff.
2. Provide a competitive benefits/compensation package to recruit
and retain quality staff.
3. Provide a quality staff development program.
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Human Resources
Administrative or Educational Support Unit
September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003
Assessment Period Covered
July 21, 2003
Date Submitted
Intended Administrative or Educational Support Objective:
1. Recruit and retain quality staff.
First Means of Assessment for Objective Identified Above:
1a. Means of Unit Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Hiring supervisors are surveyed through the Service Quality Survey
(advertising and hiring procedures) to determine the overall effectiveness
of the recruitment and referral process. A rating of “satisfactory”
or better will be reached on 90% of the responses.
1a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
Results of the survey indicated that 92% of the responses received
had a rating of “satisfactory” or better.
1a. Use of Results to Improve Unit Services:
Criteria were met and will continue to be monitored. The Service
Quality Survey (advertising and hiring process) will continue to be
used to monitor the satisfaction level of hiring supervisors.
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Human Resources
Administrative or Educational Support Unit
September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003
Assessment Period Covered
July 21, 2003
Date Submitted
Intended Administrative or Educational Support Objective:
2. Provide a competitive benefits/compensation package to recruit and
retain quality staff.
First Means of Assessment for Objective Identified Above:
2a. Means of Unit Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Existing employees are surveyed to measure employee attitudes and
identify University strengths and weaknesses. Using the existing instrument,
Survey of Organizational Excellence, a score of 3.0 or
below on “primary questions” will be addressed through communication,
seminars, and management.
2a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
Review of the Survey of Organizational Excellence results found
two “primary questions” under Fair Pay that fell below a score of 3.0.
The questions were: (1) People are paid fairly for the work they do,
and (2) Salaries are competitive with similar jobs in the community.
2a. Use of Results to Improve Unit Services:
Although these scores were an improvement over last year, the following
will be done to address this area:
(1) |
Pay increases will be reviewed during each budget cycle. |
(2) |
Increased employment benefit education will be provided through
the “Annual Enrollment” meetings, Human Resources website, Human
Resources newsletter, and employee e-mail. |
(3) |
The Administration’s commitment to ensure equitable and competitive
salaries will be shared with employees through communication materials. |
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Human Resources
Administrative or Educational Support Unit
September 1, 2002 to August 31, 2003
Assessment Period Covered
July 21, 2003
Date Submitted
Intended Administrative or Educational Support Objective:
3. Provide a quality staff development program.
First Means of Assessment for Objective Identified Above:
3a. Means of Unit Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Existing employees are surveyed using the Survey of Organizational
Excellence to identify areas needing enrichment and development,
and workshops are scheduled for areas where the “primary questions”
on the survey fall below a score of 3.0.
3a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
A construct score of 350 was achieved in the area of Employment
Development. No “primary questions” fell below a score of 3.0.
3a. Use of Results to Improve Unit Services:
Criteria were met. Will continue to monitor results and incorporate
survey used during the Annual Performance Evaluation process in order
to gather additional information on specific training/development needs.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Enter any document referenced above in this summary table. There are
two examples listed below. If no documents are cited, please remove
the two examples from the table.
SOURCE |
LOCATION/Special Instructions |
Service Quality Survey (advertising
and hiring procedures) |
SACS Resource Room
Killam Library Building Room 334-C |
2003 Survey of Organizational Excellence |
SACS Resource Room
Killam Library Building Room 334-C |