|
Marketing | 31.0% |
Management | 35.5% |
Finance | 32.3% |
Managerial Accounting | 38.2% |
Strategic Integration | 28.8% |
The mean scale score was 235.6 out of a possible 300 producing an attainment
of 78.5%. The scores are reported on two different scales and the interpretation
of the results may be revised.
1a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
Although the goals were met, the faculty decided to continue to administer
this test in the fall 2003 semester. Due to the small number of students
taking the examination and the improper administration of the examination,
no corrective action was initiated as a result of these scores. The examination
will be administered to a graduate level class in the fall 2003 and sufficient
time will be allowed for the administration of the test.
Master of Professional Accountancy (MPAcc)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2003
Assessment Period Covered
July 1, 2003
Date Submitted
Intended Educational (Student) Outcome:
NOTE: There should be one form for each intended outcome listed. Intended
outcome should be restated in the box immediately below and the intended
outcome number entered in the blank spaces.
2. Masters graduates of the accounting program must have demonstrated professional level communication skills.
First Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
2a. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Students in a research-based class will submit a final project. A departmental
committee on organization, clarity of solution, and style will rate the project. Success
is achieving an overall average of 70% with no area being rated below 50%.
2a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
The projects were reviewed with the following results:
Organization | 80% |
Clarity | 65% |
Style | 70% |
Overall attainment level | 71.7% |
2a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
This information will be distributed to the departmental faculty
for curriculum discussions during the Fall 2003 semester.
Second Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
2b. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Student presentations will be video taped in a required class. The tape
will be reviewed and rated to evaluate the speaking ability, use of PowerPoint
presentation software, and level of composure. Success is a 70% attainment
overall with not less than a 50% attainment in each area.
2b. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
An external reviewer reviewed five full-length tapes of ten student
teams. A score was recorded for each group in each of the three areas
and an overall presentation score. The following are the results:
Demonstrated speaking ability | 75% |
Use of PowerPoint software | 70% |
Level of composure | 73% |
The overall performance of the class was rate at 72.7% attainment.
2a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
The results of this review were satisfactory. The graduate presentations
in the statement analysis class will be video taped in the fall 2003 semester
to continue this evaluation process.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
SOURCE |
LOCATION/Special Instructions |
Graduate Business Test (by ETS) |
|
Final Project |
|
Student Presentations |
|