ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Bachelor of Arts in English with Grades 8th -12th Certification
in English Language Arts and Reading (BA)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2004__
Assessment Period Covered
July 20, 2004__
Date Submitted
Expanded Statement of Institutional Purpose Linkage:
Institutional Mission Reference:
Texas A&M International University, a Member of The Texas A&M
University System, is committed to the preparation of students for leadership
roles in their chosen profession and in increasingly complex, culturally
diverse state, national, and global society … Through instruction, faculty
and student research, and public service, Texas A&M International
University is a strategic point of delivery for well-defined programs
and services that improve the quality of life for citizens of the border
region, the State of Texas, and national and international communities.
College/University Goal(s) Supported:
To increase “(1) students’ ability to communicate through the use
of the written and spoken word; (2) their knowledge and appreciation
of culture, fine arts, social integration; and (3) self realization.
The College [COAS] also prepares students for a variety of professions
and roles by providing a broad-based liberal arts education.”
Intended Educational (Student) Outcomes:
1. Graduates will demonstrate a knowledge of literature
that compares favorably to that of graduates from similar programs in
the nation.
2. Graduates will be successful in passing state certification
exams for secondary teachers of English.
3. Graduates of the educator preparation program will demonstrate
adequate knowledge of instructional design and assessment to promote
student learning.
4. Graduates completing the educator preparation program will
demonstrate the skills related to implementing effective, responsive
instruction and assessment.
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Bachelor of Arts in English with Grades 8th -12th Certification
in English Language Arts and Reading (BA)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2004__
Assessment Period Covered
July 20, 2004__
Date Submitted
Intended Educational (Student) Outcome:
1. Graduates will demonstrate a knowledge of literature
that compares favorably to that of graduates from similar programs in
the nation.
First Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
1a. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Graduates will score at the 50th percentile or above
overall on a norm-referenced subject test of literature, namely the
Major Field Assessment Exam (MFAT).
1a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
There were no graduating seniors with a Bachelor of Arts in English
with a Grades 4-8 Certificate for spring 2004. Assessment will continue
fall 2004.
1a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Bachelor of Arts in English with Grades 8th -12th Certification in
English Language Arts and Reading (BA)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2004__
Assessment Period Covered
July 20, 2004__
Date Submitted
Intended Educational (Student) Outcome:
2. Graduates will be successful in passing state certification
exams for secondary teachers of English.
First Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
2a. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Within one year of graduation, 80% or higher of graduates will pass
the Texas Examination of Educator Standards 117 (TExES) Exam for English
Language Arts and Reading for Secondary School Certification by the
State of Texas.
2a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
Because the TEXES is offered several times throughout the spring
semester, data was collected on seniors and recent (within one year)
graduates for all of the Spring, 2004 test dates. Students who took
the exam multiple times are counted for the last time they took the
exam, through the May 22, 2004 test date.
Of the 5 qualifying students who tested, 5 passed, yielding a rate
of 100%. (1)
2a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
The department of Language and Literature has adopted a multifaceted
approach based on the results. The first of these intends to fine-tune
the criteria and assessment techniques. The latter two are programmatic—one
curricular, one extra-curricular.
Because the percentage above would be more useful to us if it were
to reflect 1) the total number of seniors who took the exam and passed
during the Fall, 2003 semester; 2) the number of times students took
the exam before passing (when students took it more than once); and,
3) how students scored on specific subject domains within the test framework,
we have decided to expand the original criteria for success, above,
to:
Within one year of graduation, including the two semesters preceding
graduation, 80% or higher of graduates will, on their first or
second attempt, pass the Texas Examination of Educator Standards
117 (TExES) Exam for English Language Arts and Reading for Secondary
School Certification by the State of Texas with scores above 235 in
all domains of the exam.
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Bachelor of Arts in English with Grades 8th -12th Certification
in English Language Arts and Reading (BA)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2004__
Assessment Period Covered
July 20, 2004__
Date Submitted
Intended Educational (Student) Outcome:
3. Graduates of the educator preparation program will demonstrate
adequate knowledge of instructional design and assessment to promote
student learning.
First Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
3a. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Graduates of the educator preparation program will score at or near
70% on the Texas Examinations of Educator Standards (TExES) exam for
Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities, Domain I.
3a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
There were no graduates during this semester.
3a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
Because there were no graduates, the program faculty could not make
recommendations at this time.
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
Bachelor of Arts in English with Grades 8th -12th Certification
in English Language Arts and Reading (BA)
Instructional Degree Program
Spring 2004__
Assessment Period Covered
July 20, 2004__
Date Submitted
Intended Educational (Student) Outcome:
4. Graduates completing the educator preparation program will
demonstrate the skills related to implementing effective, responsive
instruction and assessment.
First Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
4a. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
Ninety percent (90%) of students completing the educator preparation
program on the Field Performance Evaluations will be at or near 85%
with no score lower than 65%.
4a. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
There were no graduates in this semester.
4a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
Because there were no graduates, the program faculty could not make
recommendations at this time.
Second Means of Assessment for Outcome Identified Above:
4b. Means of Program Assessment & Criteria for Success:
At the Portfolio Defense, the students completing the educator preparation
program will provide evidence of knowledge and performance of instructional
design and assessment with a score of 80% or better, as determined by
a team of Field Supervisors using a common rubric.
4b. Summary of Assessment Data Collected:
There were no graduates in this semester.
4b. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program:
Because there were no graduates, the program faculty could not make
recommendations at this time.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
SOURCE |
LOCATION/Special Instructions |
(1) TExES 117-Eng. L.A.
& Rdg. |
|
Field Performance Evaluations |
|
common rubric (need proper
name) |
|