By David Velasquez
The recent, abrupt dismissal of Dr. Herbig, a three year marketing professor at Tamiu, has left many questions unanswered about the role that Texas A & M System policy plays in the decision-making process of this branch of the A & M system. In question are the faculty and employee guidelines found in the Texas A & M Faculty and Employee Handbook which supposedly govern employee conduct and provide for a system of due process for eliminating problematic behavior. However, Dr. Herbig lamented that these rules were not followed in his particular case. According to Herbig, "the administration either through ignorance of the rules, lack of interest in them, or pure arrogance, blatantly ignored the guidelines set up in the faculty handbook and the Texas A & M own system's guidelines" in deciding his status with this university.
Dr. Herbig stated that despite his "excellent attendance record," one which shows two absences in a span of three years ( not counting two which were taken for attending a professional seminar), and his "professional accomplishments" in having published 6 books and 100 articles during his three year employment with the University, his status as a Marketing Professor here at the University was terminated with "uncalled-for expediency," and for no immediately known reason. He further added that it was not until he appealed to the legal system that he was given a reason for his termination.
According to Herbig, he was terminated for having provided his IT 5320 (International Trade now titled Global Environment of Business) students with independent work time over the second summer session. During this session, to accommodate his students' needs for time in the short summer session, Herbig allowed his students to independently work on their term papers and in-class oral presentations by having them meet independently in teams during regularly scheduled class time. Herbig stated that he "went through extraordinary lengths during the course of SSII to assist students during their term projects." He further added that he provided his students with a list of "multiple pages of web sites" and put "on reserve at the library over 60 books for the students to access." In evaluating his actions, Herbig emphasized that the "positive student feedback" that he received, " and the professional status of many of the final reports and presentations showed the time spent was well worth it."
Despite the fact that "no secret was made of the time off from classes for that week" in question, this is the reason that Dr. Herbig claims was given for his "expedient" dismissal. Herbig further stated that Dr. Fatemi, the Chair for the Business Department, gave him "tacit approval for the schedule and the classes not to meet" when he failed to "critique" that week of independent study. According to Herbig, he provided Dr. Fatemi with a copy of his syllabus almost "2 months before classes began," yet Dr. Fatemi failed to make mention of any problems he had with that particular item. Instead, Dr. Fatemi "made numerous comments on the syllabi and the scheduled topics" for which he made revisions. Herbig added that after making the necessary revisions, he returned it back to Chair's office "where it was accepted as modified." To confirm Dr. Herbig's allegations regarding this matter, attempts were made to locate Dr. Fatemi, but these were unsuccessful due to the fact that Dr. Fatemi was reportedly out on an out-of-town trip.
In regards to the nature of the procedure used to terminate him, Dr. Herbig feels that he was treated "worst than the lowest kind of employee." According to him, he was not given the "dignity of being told in person" instead, he was informed of his termination through the E-Mail. He further added that even the "lowest kind of employee" is afforded two weeks notice whereas all he was given was two days to leave the campus or risk "being physically thrown out by the campus police." He reportedly was told by the campus police that if he "set foot on the campus, he would be charged with trespassing." He also stated that he was forbidden to make any contact with faculty and students. To make matters worst, Dr. Herbig claims that he was not afforded due process as is stated in the Texas A & M Faculty Handbook. He was simply told to leave.
Dr. Herbig claims that in his entire time with Texas A & M International University, he never received any annual evaluations as is required by Texas A & M policy. Also, there was never any documented actions on his file that would show reasonable cause to justify termination, far less the abrupt manner in which the termination was carried out. According to Herbig, A & M policy states that the University is responsible for the burden of proof. They must show cause, which he feels they did not, given the fact that there were never any written reprimands of any sort leading to his termination. Contrary to the turn of events, Dr. Herbig stated that he should have received a "congratulatory note" rather than a "termination notice" for the work he did with the students over the summer. Herbig, whose motto is "I have yet to have a student who claimed he did not get his money's worth," feels that he is being "punished because I was innovative and worked my students hard and achieved much more than they would have ordinarily received."
In reference to the termination hearing, a right which is also guaranteed under the Employee Handbook, he claimed that he was granted this right only after he sought relief from the legal system. He stated that this was only made possible after the Attorney General was forced to intervene in the matter when he appealed to the courts. Herbig added, "I would have been summarily terminated without having an opportunity to state my case...and defend myself against unfounded allegations...if I had not expended a great deal of my own time, energy, and money" to seek a hearing. He further added that the administration's actions were "contrary to A & M system policy and generally accepted human resource practices." Herbig also argues that the University's policy of "shoot first and ask questions later" is inconsistent to our democratic society's cornerstone belief that "one is innocent until proven guilty." Instead the University chose to subscribe to the notion that "one is guilty until proven innocent." Herbig then emphasized that "due process is one of the cornerstones of our legal system and protection to our democracy."
To confirm Dr. Herbig's claims that he was denied due process, numerous attempts were made to the Provost's office as well as the President's
office, but neither could be found for numerous reasons. Calls to individual members of the panel were also made, but none proved fruitful. The panel, which was charged with the duty of sustaining, or overturning the administration's recommendation to terminate Dr. Herbig, chose to terminate Herbig as per his statement to The Bridge. A member of the panel did state that a public statement was forthcoming, but was dependent upon Dr. Jennett's decision. The members who sat on the panel included Dr. Sakta, Dr. Vaughn, and Dr. Keck, who chaired the panel.
According to Dr. Boyd, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, Mr. Herbig was indeed given a strong written reprimand for previous violations of University policy and was then given 12 month notice of his dismissal. When Mr. Herbig once again violated University policy, cause was found to dismiss at that point. The administration has the option to grant a hearing either before or after dismissal. In this instance they decided that it would be best to give Mr. Herbig a hearing after being dismissed. Mr. Herbig then filed an injunction, which would have allowed him to finish out his 12 months at TAMIU. An agreement was reached by both parties in which Mr. Herbig was placed on the payroll for September and Mr. Herbig agreed to abide by the committee's decision and the injunction was removed. The committee voted unanimously to uphold Mr. Herbig's dismissal and Dr. Jennet, President of TAMIU, upheld the committee's findings.
by Eddie Valdez
According to David VerMilyea, Director of Student Development, the gym should be ready to use in three to four weeks. At this moment, the gym is currently home to the Office of Student Development, the Student Government Association and several kinesiology classes.
VerMilyea stated that the basketball court and weight room, the facilities most desired by the student body, should be ready within a month. Students were under the impression that the gym would be useable after construction, but unfortunately it was not.
The court and weight room were suppose to be ready, but VerMilyea stated the delay was due to equipment arriving late as a result of the UPS strike.
When fully functioning, the weight room will have several exercise machines specifically designed to help work on those trouble spots. A variety of free-weights will also be available The court will not only be limited to basketball, students will also be able to choose from volleyball and badminton.
The gym will also contain showers and lockers. There will 100 lockers for both sexes available.
In order to use the facilities, students must have a valid TAMIU ID. Along with a valid ID, students must have the proper shoes. Students must also be under proper supervision by the gym staff, which is currently being assembled.
As far as any sporting events being scheduled, that will not be happening any time soon. But you sports fans should not lose hope, VerMilyea stated that several intramural games could be staged between various colleges and clubs to let the students have a healthy dose of competition.
As for the future of TAMIU's recreational opportunities, there is no racquetball court, but an outdoor playing area is in the works for outdoor activities such as soccer and softball.
Editors Note: This letter was sent by Eliza Carranco to Dr. Brown, Ms. Norma Cano, Odie Arambula, and myself in response to difficulties she faced in receiving her D.D. Hachar Scholarship check. Miss Carranco is deeply concerned about this issue and has asked that we print her letter to bring the matter to the public's attention.
Dear Dean Brown,
I have a grievance with the university's staff, and specifically with the
Business Office. According to TAMIU policy scholarship recipients must wait
until the 12th class day until they can pick up their scholarship checks.
I understand the meaning of, but not the reasons for this policy. I believe
scholarship recipients should not be subjected to a lengthy and unnecessarily
frustrating process when we want to pick-up our scholarship checks from the
business office.
I went a day early to find out if the checks would be ready for the 12th class day. I was treated quite rudely without just cause. I felt the two employees; a male and female, working in the office were uninformed, uncooperative and had an attitude problem. They told me the scholarship checks would not be issued until the 12th class day. My primary question was if the checks were not ready on the 12th class day when would they be ready, and when could I pick up my check. I needed to know in advance so I could make special arrangements to pick up my check since I have a very chaotic school and work schedule. She was unable to give me a definite date and curtly suggested that I would have to check back sometime in the following week. I was unhappy about the situation but I agreed and followed her instructions. This occurred on September 15, 1997, between the hours of 3:20 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.
I returned the following week on Monday, September 22, 1997. Much to my disappointment they did not have my check ready. They explained that the scholarships were processed in batches and the first batch had already been processed and given out. I asked again if they knew when my check was going to be processed, but they could not give me an actual date. This time they were extremely curt and very rude. They projected themselves as though they had "better" things to do rather than answering student questions about topics directly related to the business office. After much aggravation I accepted the fact that I would not get any definite answers that day, so I asked when I should go back. I was told, more curtly and sternly than before, that they did not have any information and I would have to check back sometime the following week. I questioned them for a more definite answer. They admitted they might have some information about the status of my check by Wednesday, September 24, 1997. At that time they did not ask for my name or social security number. They did not offer to, or even suggest that they could have found out the status of my scholarship check by checking their computerized records. All of my frustration and trouble could have been avoided if they had been more helpful and checked their computer, rather than giving me the "brush off."
When I returned on Thursday, September 25, 1997, I was finally asked for my name and social security number. I was then informed that my check had already been processed the first batch and had already been mailed several days earlier. Furthermore, the female clerk commented- to the male clerk attending me that "[the office] had gotten tired of waiting for people to pick them up so they mailed [the checks]." I asked where my check had been mailed to and the male clerk recited the address on his screen; it was not my current address. I had submitted a change of address to the admissions office three weeks prior to this incident, but the change had still not been made. I was very upset with the whole situation and accused them of losing my check. My exact words were, "you lost my $ 700.00 scholarship check". Their only response was that they did not know where my check was. All they could tell me was that it had been mailed out because I had "failed to pick it up."
I became infuriated and demanded that they tell me where my check was. They told me a trace would be put on it and blamed the post office for losing the check. They completely ignored the business office's error. I was told a trace would take a week and I would have to wait for my check. I answered by saying it was unfair that I would have to wait another week when I had already waited five weeks. I then asked what would happen when they found the check and how long would I have to wait. The male clerk informed me that my check would be voided and re- issued. I asked how Long the re-issuing process would take and was told it would take two to three days. I complained that it wasn't fair that I would have to wait another seven to nine days for a check I should have received several weeks ago. He wanted me to return the following week and pickup my check. I refused and asked to speak to someone who could help me.
First I was directed to Ms. Cano, who was out of the office and then to Ms. Padria, the clerks' direct supervisor. Ms. Padria was very helpful. I explained my situation, and emphasized that I had already been more than patient in awaiting my money. She assured me that my check would be ready by 3:00 p.m. the next day September 26, 1997. 1 made sure that I would receive my money that Friday. She assured me that either I would receive my original check or I would be issued a new check. I was issued a new check that Friday.
I have many questions about TAMIU's policy regarding scholarship checks. According to the D.D. Hachar scholarship foundation my scholarship money has been in TAMIU's bank account since August 21, 1997. Would you please explain why students have to wait till the 12th class day for their scholarship money even though tuition for the fall semester has to be paid by August 15? TAMIU was paid four days before it received my scholarship money. TAMIU is earning interest on the student scholarships in that bank account. The interest is being generated, in part, from the hard work of dedicated students who earned those scholarships. I want to know why you hold the money for such a long time after it is deposited? I also want to know what happens to the interest earned on all the deposited scholarship monies? As a scholarship recipient I know that neither my scholarship foundation, nor I receive any of that interest. Does that money go to the university, and if so what is it used for?
TAMIU is very particular as to when students must pay tuition. If a student does not meet the payment deadline he or she is dropped from his or her classes without exceptions. Why then, does the university not have the same sense of timeliness and urgency when it comes to giving students the money they have already earned? It feels as if TAMIU, and some TAMIU staff, makes it as difficult as possible for scholarship recipients to get their money. The level of incompetence at such a highly regarded university is unbelievable. Another question I have is what is the scholarship processing procedure? How do they choose which checks are to be processed first? Is it done by alphabetical order, or by the amount of money one is to receive? I am very interested as to how the whole process works and would be interested in learning more about the procedures involved in the process.
So far, my experiences at TAMIU have left a lot to be desired. I like my fellow students, my instructors, and the university as a whole but I wish there could be a general attitude adjustment in the office staff. I feel the university would gain a lot from better staff training. I plan to remain at TAMIU and hopefully to graduate from this university. I have enjoyed all of my classes and have learned much from them. I know there are many caring and helpful staff members here at TAMIU; I have worked with many of them. Although I have had some good experiences it does not make up for the many others who I have dealt with that I feel have a lot to learn about "people skills."
Sincerely,
[Signed]
Miss Eliza A. Carranco
Junior at TAMIU
Civil rights are basically our rights as civilians in this country. When one's civil rights are violated, many questions arise. Such was the case in an incident with a TAMIU student, Israel Santillan, and a campus police officer, Mr. Bill Copeland. Mr. Santillan's civil rights were violated when Officer Copeland grabbed him by the arm and assumed that he was the "suspicious character" that had been seen in the "parking lot earlier that day." However, it has been said that Officer Copeland was not in proper uniform and did not identify himself, so Mr. Santillan did not fully cooperate. This small incident snowballed into a big commotion that involved these two parties, the campus police chief, and two other eye witnesses.
This happening raises many questions and concerns about what actually occurred that day. The main emphasis in this case is the truth. The story totally contradicts itself due to the statements that were given by the eye witnesses and the chief of police. However, the facts all show that Mr. Santillan's right were obstructed. The facts are: Officer Copeland was not in proper uniform at the time of the incident. The officer grabbed Mr. Santillan without any introduction. Mr. Santillan was not told why he was being detained. Israel was threatened by the chief of police. Mr. Santillan's civil rights were violated.
It is obvious here that someone is withholding some valuable information or covering up for a wrong doing. It is also obvious that Israel and the two female eye witnesses are telling the truth because they actually have nothing to lose. This makes me question the procedures and actions that were taken that day by Mr. Copeland as well as the police chief himself. It was stated by the police chief that Mr. Copeland was wearing his police uniform at the time of this incident. It is described as a dark blue uniform with red stripes. The witnesses and Israel say that Officer Copeland was wearing, "black military-type pants,...black t-shirt with a small faded emblem of TAMIU, and a pistol belt," at the time of this happening. The chief of police says that this uniform that was described is one that is used by police explorers. However, I have personally seen other uniform styles besides the two that were described. This contradicts what the police chief said, and makes me question the honesty and sincerity of his statement. Also, why did Officer Copeland grab Mr. Santillan? The officer could have at least asked for the I. D. before he grabbed Israel. Due to this inconsideration and lack of communication, the student's civil rights were violated and a small incident was blown out of proportion.
Last but not least, this occurrence brings out moral questions. After Mr. Santillan was cleared as a suspect, so was the officer of this situation. Should Officer Copeland have been punished for his actions? Should the campus police chief have to apologize for his threats and comments? I feel that both the officer and chief should make a public apology. Israel Santillan suffered embarrassment from this trauma and lost valuable time.
Sincerely,
[Signed]
Melissa Y. Rodriguez
by Kathy Dunn
On Wednesday , October 8th L.U.C.H.A. ( Latino's United for Culture, Heritage, and Advancement) sponsored a discussion led by Dr. Norma Cantu entitled What is your Ethnic Group? The discussion began with an introduction to the whole concept of labels, and explained why we has humans name and label. Dr. Cantu shared her personal experience on why she chooses to identify herself as Chicana Feminist. She informed us on the origin of Chicano, and I was pleased to further learn about this topic. I did not know that the area we live on was once Azian (linked to the Aztecs). This area was named Mexico, but was pronounced Mechico- like Texas is Tejas. So, Mechico became Chicano.
I admired how Dr. Cantu stressed how she calls herself a Chicana Feminist, no one else decided for her, and it wasn't a generalized name given to her by the 1980's census. The group discussed how in Laredo, we are usually pleased with the identity of being a Laredoan. It is when we leave the safe boundaries of our town that we begin contemplate how exactly we would like to be identified.
There are many labels, for who we are, where we come from, and even where we're going (Generation X ?). I'd like to think that the way we choose to identify ourselves not only celebrates our whole being, but serves as a personal guide through the many directions of our everyday life.
by Augustin (Auggie) Gamez, Jr.
This past summer, the History club, sponsored by Dr. Stanley Green, went on a field trip to Monterrey, Mexico. The purpose of the trip was to broaden students knowledge of Monterrey and Mexico in general. The majority of students on the trip attended Dr. Green's Mexican history class. He sponsors this field trip every two years in order that the students may learn more about Mexico and its culture. In order to cover expenses, the group held fundraisers, such as a taco plate sale. Also, the Student Government Association (SGA) gave the group money in order to complete the cost of the trip.
For three wonderful days, the club enjoyed a variety of cultural institutions such as visiting old beautiful historical churches and museums, The club also visited different Mercados (marketplaces). But the highlight of the trip was the trip to Chipininqa Mesa. This mountain is almost five thousand feet high. Once on top, the club saw a spectacular view of Monterrey and its surrounding environment. The members enjoyed themselves immensely and came back home with wonderful stories and memories.
The History club would like to thank Dr. Green, Maggie Nething, and Anna Cisneros. Although these people could not attend the trip, their contributions toward the fund-raising is appreciated.
If anyone is interested in joining the History club, you can contact Augustin (Auggie) Gamez, Jr. at 723-1563 or at ag0O4631@tamiu.edu.
by Ismael Hinojosa
In April of 2045 a large crowd of students, administrators, faculty, politicians from far and wide, and community members will gather at the center of a University which stretches from Del Mar Boulevard to Clark street and unearth a time capsule buried fifty years earlier. There that vaunted vault will by pried open as hordes of media gather with their high-tech cameras beaming that image directly to your TV/computer/video-phone. There, as the artifacts are shown to the gathered crowed, a person not unlike yourself, will point to one of the artifacts and a once vague concept will become crystal clear. They will turn to one of their friends and say, That's where that tradition began!
Our University's slogan, The New Tradition. That phrase puzzles me slightly in that the word new means recently created and tradition is a long established custom. In a literal sense we can consider that slogan an oxymoron. But in order to determine if that slogan is in fact a logical one, we must look past the dictionary meanings of words and explore their effects on the tangible. We must examine our University and ourselves to discover if a new tradition is at all possible at TAMIU.
TAMIU, which opened its lecture halls in 1995, is the newest University in the state of Texas and as such we have little in the way of history or tradition. Some may see this as a flaw in the University, but I for one see it as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Everything we accomplish here, today, will determine the future of this University. Every exam we take, every lecture we give, every decision we make adds another brick in its foundation. Indeed everything we do sets a precedent that future generations of students, faculty and administrators will either adhere to or reject.
Thanks to the hard work and dedication of my predecessors, Mr. Carlos Guardiola and Mr. Tim Kennedy, The Bridge has established itself as a part of the new tradition at Texas A&M International University. As editor-in-chief of your newspaper I would like to continue that tradition and maybe establish a few new ones. I want to put forth a newspaper that you would be proud to call the voice of your alma mater. In order to do so I felt that it was necessary to give The Bridge a more interactive and dynamic nature. Arthur Miller, the famous playwright , once said, A good newspaper, I suppose, is a nation talking to itself. I want The Bridge to talk to you, but to do so we need your input. Stop by the office (418 Killam), gives us a call (326-2472) or write us some email (journalism@tamiu.edu) tell us what you like or don't like about the paper. Tell us what interests you and what you want to see covered. After all, this newspaper is nothing without you. To make The Bridge a more dynamic newspaper we are changing its format to make it more appealing and eye-catching. Also, we hope to deliver your voice on a biweekly basis starting in the Spring semester of 1998 and on a weekly basis possibly in Fall of 1998.
A large burden has been placed on our shoulders. Not only are we responsible for our own destinies but in many ways we are also responsible for the fate of future generations of students. Our triumphs and failures will be the foundation upon which TAMIU will stand. We are pioneers, torch bearers, and trail blazers. We are the New Tradition of TAMIU.
The hearing concerning my termination was held Tuesday, September 30, 1997 at an administration-designated location on campus, with a administratively hand-picked panel, chaired by an administrator, with rules designated by the university administration, and with Proceedings controlled by the administration. Since this was not a legal procedure, witnesses could not be subpoenaed and as a result, all my witnesses were (conveniently) not available.
The university's position, based almost entirely on hearsay and undocumented, unsubstantiated allegations, was never questioned by the panel, despite its trivial charges. My own statement, well documented and logically arranged was severely questioned and chastized by the panel. In the panel's final findings of unanimously upholding the university's position, the entire fault was my own, despite the unquestioned errors by the administration in handling the termination proceedings, despite its blatant ignorance or willful lack of regards of systems policies and procedures in its own Faculty handbook. President Jennett in a thorough examination of the facts in the case affirmed the panel's findings in just a few minutes.
I am naturally disappointed but not surprised at the University's decision. I am only sorry I could not get a fair, impartial, unbiased hearing from my own peers.
In one sense, I am relieved that I will not have to continue to work in such a stress filled autocratic dictatorship that TAMIU has become. I pity the remaining faculty, though. Without the guts to stand up for one of their own peers, they have signaled to the administration that it can continue its arrogant, rule-ignoring ways. It will only get worse as the administration has learned no one will stand up to it. The faculty has no one to fault but themselves for what will become of TAMIU.
[signed]
Paul Herbig
October 10, 1997
by Eddie Valdez
The United States of American was created by our ancestors to escape the fear of persecution by the government. That is what makes the actions by some of our county and city officials so despicable. Trying to run a man and his legitimate business out of town is not only unfair and underhanded, but it also mocks the spirit with which this great country was founded. Allowing the powers that be to force Xoticas out of existence opens the door for our county commissioners to act without regard for the law or fairness to further their own special, profitable interest.
Kenneth Smartt, the owner of Xoticas, has the right to operate a legitimate business no matter how much some people may hate it. The Constitution of this country clearly enumerates that citizens have the right to assemble. This same law allows the Klu Klux Klan to hold public parades promoting "white power", but it also for something more. It enables Laredo and cities all over the country to be as religiously diverse as their population needs. People are free to practice their various religious beliefs without fear of persecution.
While there are several people opposed to Mr. Smartt's business, they fail to realize that it is just that, a business. Xoticas would not be open if it was not profitable. People are not being rounded up and forced to ogle at young women's naked bodies. They are spending their hard earned dollars to sit back, relax, and ogle young women's naked bodies.
The fact is that Xoticas has customers and denying them the right to frequent a law abiding establishment is as much a violation of their rights as those of Mr. Smartt's.
Remember that when God created man and woman, they were created in his image, they were nude. No short sleeve shirts or tapered slacks. Not even a g-string. It was only after they became ashamed of their bodies, after they broke God's law that they hid their flesh from the eyes of the Creator. Had they obeyed God's wishes, everyone would be naked.
Closing down Xoticas is not only an insult and a threat to what this country stands for, it is a rejection of perhaps God's most beautiful creation, the human form.
by James Buckley
Traditionally pay day is a happy day. We all look forward to getting money again even if we already have a pile of bills that needs attention. The classified staff here at TAMIU is no different. In fact, many of the classified staff employees thought September was going to be an extra-happy month since they were supposed to get a raise. Classified staff on campus consists of nonadministrative, faculty or student employees who work on campus like clerks, secretaries and duplicator assistants. TAMIU is a state institution so all the employees of TAMIU are state employees. Recent state legislation gave all state employees a raise. All classified staff here at TAMIU were to receive an extra $100 a month as a result of this. Unfortunately, someone started spreading a rumor that student employees on campus were also to receive this raise and when they found out they were not going to get this raise many student employees became angry. They were not the only ones angered by the confusion of the new raise. The first pay check that would show this raise was in September. The first check using the bi-weekly wage system was also in September. Both things going on at once caused such confusion that many employees were outraged when they saw their checks. Instead of seeing a raise, people thought they were losing money with the new system. Many also worried about being able to pay big bills like mortgages and medical bills. Strangely enough, it is what they wanted.
For some time several employees had commented on wanting a bi-weekly salary instead of monthly. Some employees had started working here after leaving a job that used a bi-weekly(every two weeks) or semi-monthly(twice a-month) system. These employees had to get used to the TAMIU monthly system. When Jose Moctezuma first started here he thought, "My God!" It was hard at first but they did get accustomed to the monthly system. This summer several surveys were done at staff workshops. Not all of the 140 classified staff employee attended. Most did and of these employees were asked if they were "in favor of the payroll change to bi-weekly". Of those surveyed, 34.91% agreed and 45.45% strongly agreed These numbers seem best expressed with the comment someone wrote on the survey, "I am satisfied, it seams to benefit me. Thank." Other comments, though foreshadowed the chaos that would ensue when the bi-weekly system was implemented: "Hope this will be a good change...", "This could have quite an impact on those on the lower end of the salary scale", "Monthly was better for me."
Jose D. Moctezuma is the director of the Office of Budget, Payroll, Grants and Contracts. Many people came to him with complaints of the new bi-weekly system soon after receiving the first bi-weekly check. Some wanted to know why they were receiving less money annually with this system when they were supposed to see an increase due to the raise. Others wanted to know how they were going to pay their bills with so little money given them each check. He told me he would "like to apologize if there was any misunderstandings." Something needed to be done. One morning recently while shaving, Mr. Moctezuma was inspired to create a sample breakdown of payments for an employee showing how the 26 checks received a year totaled the annual salary an employee should receive. It works out and it shows the $1,200 yearly increase due to legislation, It is possible some people were just multiplying one bi-weekly check by 24(as in a bi-monthly system) instead of 26 to figure out what this system would give annually. This breakdown was not available during the summer workshops, though. If it had been people would have been able to get a better concept of how much they would actually receive with the bi-weekly system before being surveyed.
Many employees are happy with bi-weekly pay. Instead of 12 checks a year they get 26. Classified staff even get paid 3 times in January and July of this budget year. Not all employees have to make huge monthly payments like mortgages and medical bills. For people who do the change will and has been difficult. In the end, the frequency classified staff employees get paid is decided on by the employees themselves. There will be another survey on November 3. All of the people hurt by the new system should participate. Hopefully now that the employees know how a bi-weekly system actually works TAMIU will be able to use the upcoming survey to implement a salary system that better serves the employees.
Career Planning and Placement offices are often overlooked until you absolutely, positively, need something from them, right then and there, with no minute to spare because you graduated yesterday. By then - it's probably too late get even adequate services. Don't miss out on opportunities that could change the direction of your life. The Career Planning and Placement (CP&P) office at TAMIU recommends....
In your first year at TAMIU:
ï First and most importantly, get to know the friendly staff & growing
services at Career Planning and Placement.
ï Focus on researching ALL you can about your career field. Use the
Career Resource Center in KL 157 as a starting point, talk to your professors,
find information on the Internet, etc.
ï Collect, analyze, and evaluate information concerning your personality,
abilities, skills, values, interests, academic training and life experiences
(with the help of a friendly career counselor and the tools available such
as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, DISCOVER, or the Self-Directed Search).
ï Set up a time to meet with a Career Counselor to put together a
personalized plan for the coming years. Make sure you address the following
questions:
What do I want to do?
What can I do?
What do I need to improve myself?
What do I need to get the job I want after graduation?
ï Consider working part-time while studying and/or during your Summer
break. You'll gain work EXPERIENCE and SKILLS, plus earn money toward your
university expenses.
ï Begin to develop your computer skills as of THIS MOMENT. Know
wordprocessing, open an e- mail account, familiarize yourself with the Internet
- and USE THEM!
Sophomore year
Getting the info you need:
ï Read information about the world of work, office politics, career
advancement, coming trends, etc. (This info can be found all around you but
the Career Resource Center has a number of books and periodicals to help
with understanding the world of work).
ï Begin to develop your resume, set networking goals, put together a
sample cover letter. CP&P sponsors workshops every month, has samples
and/or can assist with all of these.
ï Set up informational interviews with professionals in your field by
using CAN (Career Aspirations Network) to investigate different fields of
interest.
ï Participate in the Mentor program. You'll be paired with a professional
who can answer questions with first hand experience. Applications are still
being accepted.
ï Work with a faculty member who is willing to help with your career
aspirations.
ï Participate in a Career Planning Group session or similar program.
ï Join field-related student organizations to better understand different
majors, develop leadership skills, and attend career related events.
ï Check out Global Opportunities (March 23, 1998) and the Teacher Fair
(TBA) in the Spring semester. These fairs brings employers, programs, and
schools from all around the country. Identify early on who you'd like to
work for and what you should be preparing for. You might even find internship
or Summer opportunities.
Junior Year
Trying for the best fit:
ï Plan for an internship in your field - make yourself marketable for
jobs after graduation & test drive the field.
ï Attend our different job preparation workshops (don't be afraid to
ask us to custom make one for you or your group!)
ï Consider advanced degrees for your immediate future or after more
work experience. Even if this is not your chosen route, you will have made
an informed decision.
ï Schedule mock interviews and practice answers to tough interview
questions.
ï Network! Network! Network!
ï Use the Internet for current career information. Subscribe to a listserv
focusing on your field.
ï Gather information about the workplace and potential barriers that
you may face as an employee. Prepare to overcome them and turn them into
opportunities for growth.
ï Establish a resume file in our FirstPlace! database by using the
Discresume (available at the TAMIU bookstore with a signed clearance slip
from CP&P).
Finally - Senior year:
ï Discuss career possibilities with faculty, friends, counselors,
acquaintances, and network contacts. Talk to everybody you can - they may
be able to assist you in your job search
ï Commit yourself to a THOROUGH job search. Schedule on-campus recruitment
and company interviews with as many employers as possible.
ï Use the Career Resource Center to find companies & firms actively
recruiting job candidates or contact to those you are interested in.
ï Establish a credential file if you are an education major or in the
arts & humanities.
ï Accept the job that best fits your career, professional, and personal
needs.
ï Develop and work on a checklist of areas to address in making your
transition from college to the workplace (or graduate school).
ï Perform effectively, be a team member, support your manager, and move
up or challenge yourself in the organization.
As an Alumni member of TAMIU:
Use Career Planning and Placement for all of the services offered to current
students. Graduation does not mean you are no longer a part of the TAMIU
family - your resume can still be referred (of course, you need to be registered
first), workshops have a standing open invitation to you, the Career Resource
Center will have vacancy binders available for your browsing, etc.
As part of this family, though, we need you as a resource for our current students, too. You can serve as a reference point for students or organizations seeking information through CAN (Career Aspirations Network). Lastly, TAMIU students make excellent employees - after all, you did great. Don't forget TAMIU students for your permanent vacancy or internship needs.
As we leave you this month, we invite you to our upcoming events:
ON-CAMPUS RECRUITMENT
(sign-up required for most, info available at KL 157)
October 15 HEB Management Trainee - Information Session
October 15 Laredo National Bank - Information Session
October 16 LNB Management Trainee Program - Interviews
October 17 HEB Management Trainee Program - Interviews
October 20 Metlife - Resume/Application Deadline
October 21 Metlife - Interviews
October 23 U.S. Marine Corps - Information & Interviews
October 23 Ft. Worth Ind. School District - Information session for November
weekend trip
October 24-25 Americorps - Information tables
October 24 Rush Peterbilt - Resume/Application Deadline
November 4 Rush Peterbilt - Interviews
November 12 Enterprise Rent-A-Car Mgmt. Trainee Program - Resume/Sign-Up
Deadline
November 14 Enterprise Rent-A-Car Mgmt. Trainee Program - Interviews
December 1 INROADS Internship Program - Application Deadline
On-going Project 1000 (Entry into Graduate School program) - Application
Deadline
FALL 1997 WORKSHOPS
(to be held in KL 157, except for P.D.E.)
November 5, 5:30pm Resume/Cover Letter Writing
November 6, 5:30pm Interview Skills
November 7, 2:00pm Salary Negotiation
November 21, TBA Professional Dining Etiquette (participation fee required)
December 3, 5:30pm Interview Skills
December 4, 5:30pm Resume/Cover Letter Writing
JOB FAIR TRIPS
(sign-up is required, limited seating)
October 14 Texas A&M Corpus Christi Job Fair
November 20 SACUPA Job Fair (San Antonio)
Our goal is to provide you with the best service we can. We welcome suggestions and invite you to participate in improving our services. Stop by and visit KL 157 - we want you to succeed! If you/your organization want to add/request information or our services, please call us at 326-2260.
by Rose M. Rodriguez-Rabin
Texas A&M International University's Great Room in the Sue and Radcliffe Killam Library will be graced with the solo piano performance of Dr. Mary Grace Carroll on October 26, 1997 at 4:00.
Dr. Carroll, Director of Piano Studies at the Vidal M. Trevino School of Communications and Fine Arts will present a solo piano recital with feature works Opus 10, No. 1 in C major by Ludwig van Beethoven, Ballad in g minor by Frederic Chopin, and Sonata Opus 22 by an Argentine composer, Alberto Ginastera.
She earned a Doctor of Musical Arts degree in piano performance from the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida. Her graduate and undergraduate degrees are from the Catholic University of America and Texas A&M University Corpus Christi.
In addition to directing the piano studies at the Vidal M. Trevino School of Communication and Fine Arts and her private studio, she has held teaching positions at Northwestern State University, Natchitoches, Louisiana, and Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Dr. Carroll has also held lectures on mental practice for pianists at Northwestern State University and at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.
She stated, "I am honored and look forward to performing on the new Baldwin Grand Piano in the Texas A&M International University's Great Room. This is my first solo performance in Laredo, and I've selected composers from previous recitals given in Corpus Christi, Washington, D.C., Miami, and Natchitoches, La. These pieces represent musical styles ranging from Classical to Contemporary, and display a broad spectrum of performance practices."
by Francisco Rodriguez
The Rio Grande International Study Center is setting up once again for their third annual Dia del Rio. The purpose of this event is to protect and improve water resource quality by having volunteers assist in walking by the river banks and picking up trash and planting tree seeds.
It is an important event for the Rio Grande has been our only source of life and joy through ages. In last year's event the number of volunteers amounted to the hundreds.
Donations collected from this beneficial event are used by Rio Grande International Study Center to continue providing its environmental programs and services to the community. This non- profit organization is very dedicated to its work and continually plan projects of this kind.
The focus of this year's event will be improving a two mile nature trail which will be soon inaugurated and dedicated. There will be lunch and entertainment provided for all volunteers.
The itinerary is as follows:
8:00 to 9:00 Registration
9:00 to 11:00 Trail Work (Participants need to bring gloves, working equipment,
etc.) Wear comfortable clothing!
11:00 to 11:30 End of Trail Work &Clean-up
11:30 to 12:30 Lunch/Entertainment
12:30 to 1:30 Awards
The day of this event is Saturday, October 18, 1997, and will take place on the north end of Laredo Community College campus. The event is organized by RGISC Director James M. Earhart. For additional information call 721-5392.
by Norma Quintero
The Department of Education at Texas A & M International University recently received information from the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) concerning issues involving teachers who are already certified. This board, which is responsible for issuing certificates to qualified teachers, expects teachers to continue developing their professional skills along with seeking more education. This document, called Framework For Educator Preparation and Certification, was developed May 16, 1997 and is considered a working document by the SBEC staff.
If the certified teachers comply with these new requirements, they should not worry about losing their certification. According to Dr. Rosa Maria Vida, "there is no need to panic." It will take at least two years to implement any new changes for those teachers currently certified. The State Board for Educator Certification has laid out some assumptions, rational and critical implementation issues. The working document states, ". . . Continuing education and renewal requirements must focus on professional growth and must be flexible to accommodate the individual needs of 300,000 public school educators."
The document also gives a rational which states that, "the diversity of our state's students and public school system, coupled with advances in technology and research, demands that educators continually update both their content area as well as educational knowledge and skills. For activities to be truly relevant, preparation programs and schools districts must work collaboratively with each individual educator."
Furthermore, the critical implementation issues are then listed as: "precedent of ëlifetime' certification, implementation of renewal requirements for current educators, individualized evaluation as tool for identifying professional growth activities, linking requirements to district/campus staff development activities, role of professional organization, time and money for individuals, school districts, preparation programs, specificity of SBEC standards for professional growth and providers (,i.e., content, student populations, technology, best practices)."
These standard have been received with mixed reviews. There are some experienced teachers that feel is not right that they have to go back to school and prove themselves, again. While there are other teachers who say that this new issue is not a big worry, they feel confident that they are knowledgeable in their field. The newly certified teachers feel they are prepared to go through further testing. And for those students who are entering the program, this is all a little too confusing. One student stated that there were too many changes to keep up with. Dr. Vida expressed her concern with all of the impending issues, and said that they will continue to update the department, if any changes occur.
by Norma Quintero
"After a good deal of reflection, I submitted my resignation as Chair of the Department of English, Spanish, and Fine Arts to be effective at the end of Summer Session II, 1997," according to Dr. Frances G. Rhodes. She goes on, "it was a privilege and a pleasure to work with my colleagues, but I believe that now was the time for someone else to take the reins." The position took a lot of her time, and she felt that it was time to move on.
Dr. Ray Keck, former Associate Professor of Spanish, has now taken the position. He is eager to have a part in the planning for the Fine Arts and Performing Center. "I hope to help set in place our Fine Arts and Performing Center program and see our Spanish offerings expand to include study abroad and the Master of Arts degree," said an enthusiastic Dr. Keck
Dr. Rhodes' advised Dr. Keck to "keep your sense of humor and learn to let go of problems that come through the door almost by the hour, and don't think of it as a career." Dr. Rhodes has dedicated endless amount of hours on the curriculum -development for the downward expansion of the university's freshmen and sophomore classes. Other high-lights of her tenure as Chair of the Department of English, Spanish, and Fine Arts, are: she helped coordinate and implement the move to our new campus and our status as the largest academic department at TAMIU, she brought in and integrated eight new faculty into our existing faculty, developed a database of Graduate Students in English, Spanish, and Fine Arts (ESFA) and personal, written contact with each student every semester since Fall 1995, developed and implement the two year cycle of classes in ESFA, strove to help keep the College of Arts and Humanities on an even-keel with all other Colleges on Campus, allowed all faculty a great deal of freedom in designating sub-titles/topics for special problems classes, held to the policy of having an "Open Door" to all students, faculty, and/or staff who wanted/needed to see her at any time, and successfully mediated several grievance matters in the College of Arts and Humanities.
Dr. Rhodes also wanted to add that it was a pleasure working with her colleagues in the Department of English, Spanish, and Fine Arts. She said it has afforded her great deal of personal satisfaction. "Frankly, I think that, when all is taken into account, I have been successful as the department chair in that I worry about the ultimate needs of students, the department, and the university as a whole [while] looking out for the well-being of my faculty."
by Ismael Hinojosa
Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Baylor, Rice, UH, UT and TAMIU, what do all these universities have in common? Well many things, but you can now add one more to the list, a band and glee club. That's right, music appreciation is taking TAMIU by storm, so brush up on your vocal scales and get your instruments out of the attic. You don't even need an instrument, the university will provide a certain number of them for you. Sorry, singers must bring their own voices.
Mr. Elmo Lopez will have the distinct honor of being the first ever director of the TAMIU band. Mr. Lopez, as many of you know, was the former band director at both Martin and the Vidal M. Trevino School. In addition to that Mr. Lopez was the owner of Elmo Lopez Music Store. The glee club will be led by Mrs. Marilyn Brown, wife of our very own Dean of Student Affairs Dr. Stephan Brown.
Both the band and the glee club will be open to everyone in the university community and as an added bonus, students can even get college hours for becoming members. Students participating in either club will get a hour credit for ART 4135. The band and glee club will be holding their first meeting on October 28, at 5:30 p.m. in the Great Room.
Anyone interested in either club is strongly encouraged to attend this first meeting. For further information, call the Department of English, Spanish, and Fine Arts at 326-2470.
by Francisco Rodriguez
Celebrating El Dia de la Raza Ballet, Folklorico set out to an event in a local supermarket and once again put the name of TAMIU in a dignified place. I am part of this organization which looks to preserve a little bit of our Mexican descent and was proud to perform in front of dozens of shoppers who where enjoying the show.
Some of the dances performed include Evangelina, Las Piñas, and Las Velas.
The dance team brought the people into the show, as they had the audience yelling their classical gritos. All this while they where deciding which brand of bread was best. These events are important to make us people with Mexican roots remember our culture and is by no means a dull and unimportant occasion. It is beautiful and we should maintain it.
Other organizations need to remember we need to participate with the community and get involved in the issues affecting our community to bring up the name of our University and to feel better ourselves, becoming productive members of society.
By David Velasquez
As the Border Flag Football league concludes the first half of the season, more than half of the teams in the 15 team league are still in the play-off hunt. The Rockets, who appear on their way to sweeping through the regular season with an unblemished 7-0 record, sit atop the standings with the Sonics staying close behind at 6-1. A host of teams are log-jammed at third place with 5-2 records. The standings are as follow:
Rockets 7-0
Gamblers 3-4
Sonics 6-1
IBC 2-4
Rams 5-2
Eliminators 2-5
NuBoys 5-2
Barracudas 1-5
Dawg Posse 5-2
Young Guns 1-5
Regulators 4-2
Aztecs 0-6
Badboys 4-2
X-Factors 0-7
Bondsmen 4-3
Last week's action saw the Rockets out-distanced the IBC Vultures 26-12, the up-and- coming Sonics manhandle the slip-and-sliding Bondsmen 28-8, and the winless, but pesky, Barracudas defeat the high-charging Rams 13-6. In handing the Rams only their second defeat of the season, the Barracudas once again showed that any team in the league can beat any other team in the league at any given Sunday. Other scores on Sunday were:
Badboys 20-18 over the Newboys
Regulators 18-0 over the Gamblers
Eliminators 25-0 over the Aztecs
Dawg Posse 26-13 over Young Guns
At midseason, the teams to watch down the stretch are the undefeated Rockets, the fast-paced Sonics, and the Regulators. When the dust finally settles, one of these teams will be the Dust Bowl Champions.
by Kathy Dunn
Cars zoom by honking, an empty stare from a rear view mirror, in a crowd clamoring conversations of busy schedules, when do we stop to clear complicated details and allow ourselves to splurge in the sweet splendors of our life? Is it discipline that drives some to look beyond the first impressions of our daily lives, or is it something more? Perhaps, it is desire that guides and motivates one to pursue a destiny of deeper truths.
Personally, I believe it is all of these factors that generate the engine of our souls to search. They are the questions we carry in our guts and hear in empty comers, after the echos have bounced away.
Artists have the gift to observe with eyes of wonder, and more so, courage to share in expression openly. When one writes, paints, sculpts, or performs they allow the shy, whispering voice from within to SCREAM, raise hell, bring tears, lure lust, fighting passion- evoking emotions. Show me, don't tell me! Artists stab at injustice, cradle cultures, and stand anxious on their tipi toes, practicing, drafting, sketch after sketch in hopes of transmitting at least a shock of the energy running through their veins.
Here in Laredo, there are quite a few artists creating on canvas, moving in melody and running with the wild horses of words. Every month we will honor a local artist not only to bring awareness, but more so in celebration of the creative path they follow.
Kenney Mencher is October's artist of the month. He is a professor of Art and Art History at Texas A&M International University, and is an accomplished painter. I am enrolled in his Art History class and am witness to the intense love he has for all levels of art. Professor Mencher is not a native to Laredo, he is from New York, but he has already mastered the intertwining of Greek Art to some of the scenes found here in Laredo. He blends our present day lives, with that of a past from hundreds of years ago in less than ninety minutes. Mencher has style, a flavor for life and he lets us know how it tastes.
Kenney Mencher educates with a strong background ranging from Art& Design High school in Manhattan, NY., a BA from City University of New York, a MA from The University of California and an OH MFA in painting at The University of Cincinnati. What I admire most is how he inspires his listeners imagination, and all the information he shares glides naturally along with it.
Mencher's paintings have been featured in various art galleries, locally including a show at the Laredo Center of Arts and at LCC. I have viewed Professor Mencher's art work in class, and a great variety is located on Internet home page. I first saw his work on the Internet after attending his class for the first time. He uses the human form and face with elaborate shadows to reveal a type of silent emotion. He captures a moment when, well we don't know what to say, but we want to say so much. His paintings are like the sigh in between the sentences spoken only in our head. His work also has a very classic quality which is revealed in a 1995 oil on panel painting entitled Indian Summer, A man and a woman stand in a vast field with a look of desperation. It reminds me of a scene in Bronte's Wuthering Heights when Heithcliff and Catherine are out on the moors dreaming of a tomorrow of when they'll be together. Although the scene in the painting creates a sense of tension, the vast, glorious sky above renews it with hope. This is just one example of the many paintings Kenney Mencher has produced. Take a look at his work for yourself, and listen for the painting that speaks a story you've heard, or that of your own.
Who is this person
breathing with my lungs
and kissing with my lips?
Shedding secrets,
I grow into a skin of reality.
Every heartbeat a prayer,
lifting me when I'm light
like tiny drizzles in a breeze.
Free from feeling fake,
I'm a music note f
a
ll
ing in a melody.
Gliding with the wings of a tune
played by an instrument of truth
harmonicas, pianos and guitars
all sing a song called
"BE IN YOU"
and I hear... beautiful.
Kathy Dunn
I sit alone
in wonder of you.
Tomorrow will my eyes see?
Clouded in a vision of us,
heart feels joy, pain, sorrow.
What edge of time will bring us near?
I sit alone with yesterday.
Times of the past,
I wish would forever last.
When I love,
your vision cuts through my heart
with beauty time could never
tear apart.
I sit alone in now,
filled with feelings words
could never say.
I pray in fear for you to feel it.
What if we never see another day?
I sit alone.
I think about you.
Feelings true?
My heart patiently waits,
but I'm anxious to say
I love you.
Gabriel Rivera
i've always been a dreamer
Creating worlds where i could
escape
Your
Hate spinach
always have
i've always excelled in school
But it was not ever good
enough
For
You like spinach
always have
i've always been an Outsider
So i looked for ways to get
noticed
By
You like control
always have
i've dreamt my life away
And i still can not
get noticed
be good enough
escape
Your
Hate. you daddy
Always have
Always will
Patty De la Garza