Previous Page  10 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR SERVICE-LEARNING PEDAGOGY

The following 10 principles were created to fully understand and

integrate service-learning into coursework to have a successful

service-learning experience faculty must adhere to each of these 10

principles equally2.

Principle 1: Academic Credit is for Learning, Not for Service

This first principle speaks to those who puzzle over how to assess

students’ service in the community, or what weight to assign

community involvement in final grades. In traditional courses,

academic credit and grades are assigned based on students’

demonstration of academic learning as measured by the instructor. It

is no different in service-learning courses. While in traditional courses

we assess students’ learning from traditional course resources (e.g.

textbooks, class discussions, library research,) in service-learning

courses we evaluate students’ learning from traditional resources, from

the community service, and from the blending of the two. So, academic

credit is not awarded for doing service or for the quality of the service,

but rather for the student’s demonstration of academic and civic

learning.

Principle 2: Do Not Compromise Academic Rigor

Since there is a widespread perception in academic circles that

community service is a “soft” learning resource, there may be a

temptation to compromise the academic rigor in a service-learning

course. Labeling community service as a “soft” learning stimulus

reflects a gross misperception. The perceived “soft” service component

actually raises the learning challenge in a course. Service-learning

students must not only master academic material as in a traditional

course, but also learn from unstructured community experiences, and

merge that learning with other course resources.

2

Excerpted from Jeffrey Howard, ed., Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning: Service-Learning Course Design Workbook (Ann Arbor, MI: OCSL Press, Summer 2001: 16-19).

8