Page 61 of 93 Section 10.19 Appeals of Faculty Findings Ft haec uHl ot yn ao lroCnoe daer. eAr setsupdoennsti ’bs l ae pf op re aals os if gan fi ancgugl trya dmeepmebnearl t’ si ecshianr gt he eoi rf ac coaudr es me si cf ovri ov li aotl iaot ni omn su os tf be b 1 a . sed on one of the following reasons: Insufficient or misinterpreted evidence that led to the initial finding of the 2. violation of the Honor Code. Substantial new evidence not available at the time of the original faculty decision. Iandtehciiss ci oans eo, rt hoet hHeor nr oe lreCv oa un nt cf ai lc wt s i nl l octoknns oi dwe nr nt oe wt h ienpf oe rr ms oant iaopnptehaal ti ni sg saut ftfhi cei et inmt et ooaf ltthe er original hearing. Section 10.20 Honor Council Findings Tr ehsep oHnosni bolre ”Coofu anccai ld ewmi lilc hvei oa lra ttihoen . aTphpee aHl oannodr Ca os suenscsi l awfi il nl dniontgi f yo ft h“er esst pu odne snitb, l teh” e ofra c“unl ot yt mC oeumn bc iel r a, st hs ee scshe as i ra of fi nt dh ien dg eopfa r“ rt me sepnotn, st hi bel ed, ”e at nh ea ns dt u tdheen Pt rmo va oy s at po pf ei tasl f fi on ldl oi nwgisn. gI f t thhee aHpopneoarl process defined below. The Honor Council will disclose its determination of the academic appeal to school officials who have an educational interest in the finding or sanction. Section 10.21 Appeal to Provost of Honor Council Decisions Wb ehme raedHeoinnowr Cr oi tui nngc itl ou pt hheo l dP sr ot hv oe sf ta. c uTl thyemreemq ubeesrt’ smour isgti nbael cshuabrmg ei t,tae dr ewq ui tehsitnf o1r0a p p e a l m a y University business days after notification of the Honor Council’s decision. There are three grounds for an appeal: 1. Substantial new evidence: The Provost will consider new information that is saut ftfhiceietinmt etooaflttheer aordiegcinisailohneoarrointgh.er relevant facts not known to the person appealing 2. Procedural irregularities: The Provost will determine whether the original hearing ww ai tsh cpo rnedsuc cr ti be de df api rrloyciendlui gr he ts ogfi vt hi ne gc ht ha er gaecsc auns de de vs itduedne cnet par rees ae snot ne da b, al en do pi np coor nt uf onri tmy i tt oy 3. prepare and present rebuttal of allegations. The sanction is not commensurate with the violation: The Provost will determine wC ohdeet ,hwe rh itchhe t shaenscttui odne (nst)wi ma spfoosuendd wt oe rhea vaepcpormo pmr iiat tt ee df.o r t h e v i o l a t i o n o f t h e H o n o r
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mzk1Mzc4