Previous Page  21 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

19

Faculty may:

• Encounter questions from students that may be hard to

answer

• Find it difficult to allow time and space in the course

curriculum for consideration of unexpected learning that

occurs in the community (service-learning often requires

flexibility and a willingness to adapt the course as it progresses

in response to students’ community learning experiences)

• Be reluctant to change and/or cut down on readings or other

assignments and/or revise course learning objectives to

accommodate service-learning (which can lead to treating

service-learning like an add-on and not an integral part of the

course)

• Feel unsure about how to assess students’ learning

• Worry that there will be no professional reward or recognition

for teaching with service-learning, which others may view as

“soft,” non-rigorous, or non-academic, and not as valuable as

research.

Community partners may:

• Be reluctant to take on students with such a limited time

commitment, or to offer them meaningful work opportunities

(they need to balance their investment of time and energy

with the likely return, and consider whether short-term

volunteers could actually do more harm than good)

• Experience challenges recruiting service-learners due to

location, schedule, and transportation issues

• Have difficulty matching students’ and instructors’ hopes/

expectations for students’ experiences with the work the

community needs done

• Find it difficult to allot staff time for training and supervising

students and engaging them in reflection

• Feel hesitant about engaging in a partnership with the

University because of past experiences of being “used” by

researchers.